Latham v. . Harris
This text of 139 S.E. 773 (Latham v. . Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs, by this action to restrain and enjoin defendant, sheriff of Beaufort County, from enforcing a criminal statute in said county, seek to present for decision the question as to the constitutionality of the statute. It has been repeatedly held that this cannot be done. Moore v. Bell, 191 N. C., 305, and cases therein cited. There are no sufficient allegations in the complaint that property rights of plaintiffs are or will be affected by the enforcement of the statute to bring the action within the principle recently restated in Angelo v. City of Winston-Salem, 193 N. C., 207.
The temporary restraining order was improvidently made. The judgment dissolving this order and dismissing the action is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.E. 773, 194 N.C. 802, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latham-v-harris-nc-1927.