Latham v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 269, 1993 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 97, 1993 WL 76201
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided March 11, 1993·No. No. 90-1520·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shortly before the Court issued its decision in this case, appellant filed an addendum request predicated on grounds different from those which were originally appealed to the Court as discussed in the Court’s decision of February 12, 1992. In essence, appellant argues that he is entitled to pension based on the needs of his family. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.666(a) (1992). As this issue was not before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA), it cannot be a subject of this appeal. See Branham v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 93, 94 (1990).

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the addendum is stricken and the Clerk is to return it to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Latham v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 269, 1993 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 97, 1993 WL 76201 (Cal. 1993).

4 Vet. App. 269 (Latham v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Branham v. Derwinski
1 Vet. App. 93 (Veterans Claims, 1990)