Latham v. Blake
20 P. 417, 77 Cal. 646, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 762
Opinions
Upon rehearing, the order appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion filed in Department One, May 14, 1888, which opinion will stand as the opinion of the court in Bank.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Latham v. Blake, 20 P. 417, 77 Cal. 646, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 762 (Cal. 1888).
20 P. 417 (Latham v. Blake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Orloff v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.
180 P.2d 321 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
Sunset Realty Co. v. Dadmun
34 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 733 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
Sunset Realty Co. v. Dadmun
34 Cal. App. 2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1939)
Everts v. Will S. Fawcett Co.
74 P.2d 815 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Haigler v. Burson
298 P. 404 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1931)
Judnick v. Judnick
190 P. 480 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
Carpenter v. Lewis
50 P. 925 (California Supreme Court, 1897)