Lath v. PennyMac Loan Services LLC

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Sanjeev Lath v. Case No. 18-cv-928-PB PennyMac Loan Services LLC, et al

ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 4, 2019 . PennyMac’s partial motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. no. 15) is granted as to Count 1 and denied as to Counts 2 and 3. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

_/_s_/_ _P_a_u_l_ _J_._ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o_______ Paul J. Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: June 24, 2019 cc: Sanjeev Lath, pro se Counsel of Record