Laterik Baynard v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 2023·No. 2022-2010·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2022-2010

LATERIK BAYNARD, Appellant, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County. Melissa G. Olin, Judge.

November 22, 2023

PER CURIAM.

An Anders 1 review of the record in Laterik Baynard’s case reveals no arguable issues on appeal. There was competent, substantial evidence that he willfully violated a condition of his probation. The revocation of his probation was proper. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laterik Baynard v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Laterik Baynard v. State of Florida (Laterik Baynard v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)