Laterik Baynard v. State of Florida
This text of Laterik Baynard v. State of Florida (Laterik Baynard v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2022-2010 _____________________________
LATERIK BAYNARD,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County. Melissa G. Olin, Judge.
November 22, 2023
PER CURIAM.
An Anders 1 review of the record in Laterik Baynard’s case reveals no arguable issues on appeal. There was competent, substantial evidence that he willfully violated a condition of his probation. The revocation of his probation was proper. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Laterik Baynard v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laterik-baynard-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.