Later v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Later v. Planning & Zoning Commission

633 A.2d 743, 33 Conn. App. 912, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 446

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedNovember 23, 1993

Docket12152

StatusPublished

This text of 633 A.2d 743 (Later v. Planning & Zoning Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Later v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 633 A.2d 743, 33 Conn. App. 912, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 446 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Although the briefs submitted by the parties raise multiple legal issues, the dispositive threshold question is whether there exists any material issue of fact that would have precluded the trial court from granting summary judgment for the defendant.

We conclude that no such material issue of fact was presented by the plaintiffs’ affidavit filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment and that the granting of the summary judgment was proper.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Although the briefs submitted by the parties raise multiple legal issues, the dispositive threshold question is whether there exists any material issue of fact that would have precluded the trial court from granting summary judgment for the defendant.

We conclude that no such material issue of fact was presented by the plaintiffs’ affidavit filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment and that the granting of the summary judgment was proper.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

633 A.2d 743, 33 Conn. App. 912, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/later-v-planning-zoning-commission-connappct-1993.