Lateer v. Prudential Insurance of America
This text of 64 A.D. 423 (Lateer v. Prudential Insurance of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought by the plaintiff as administratrix of her deceased husband, to recover $500 upon a policy of insurance whereby the Prudential Insurance Company agreed to pay that sum to the executors or administrators of Judson T. Lateer within twenty-four hours after proof of his death. The basis for the order of inter-pleader is a claim to the ownership of the policy, made by one'Lewis W. Robinson, who is the son-in-law of the plaintiff. Mr. Robinson in his affidavit alleges that the plaintiff left her husband! in .September, 1900, and about that time gave to him the policy in suit and the receipt book accompanying the same, saying that she could keep it [424]*424up ho longer, and that if he would keep up the payments he coiild have the policy and all benefits to be derived thereunder.
This transaction, assuming that it took place precisely as alleged in the affidavit, conveyed no title to the instrument. The policy did not belong to Irene Lateer as the wife of the insured, nor had she any right to give it away. The instrument, as appears by the complaint, was issued and delivered to the insured husband himself, and by its terms was payable to his executors or administrators; and the wife’s right to sue upon it now grows solely out of the fact that she has been appointed administratrix.
Under these circumstances the claim of the party who has been substituted utterly lacks that reasonable foundation which is necessary to warrant an order of interpleader. (Stevenson v. New York Life Ins. Co., 10 App. Div: 233.)
The order should be reversed.
Goodrich, P. J., Woodward, Hirschberg and Jenks, JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 A.D. 423, 72 N.Y.S. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lateer-v-prudential-insurance-of-america-nyappdiv-1901.