LaTanya Thompson v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., as Successor in Interest to Indymac Bank, F.S.B.

Court of Appeals of Texas

LaTanya Thompson v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., as Successor in Interest to Indymac Bank, F.S.B.

DecidedMay 4, 2021

Docket01-21-00147-CV

StatusPublished

This text of LaTanya Thompson v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., as Successor in Interest to Indymac Bank, F.S.B. (LaTanya Thompson v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., as Successor in Interest to Indymac Bank, F.S.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LaTanya Thompson v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., as Successor in Interest to Indymac Bank, F.S.B., (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: LaTanya Thompson v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., as the Successor in Interest to IndyMac Bank, FSB Appellate case number: 01-21-00147-CV Trial court case number: 1156055 Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County On April 27, 2021, appellant, LaTanya Thompson, filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. In her motion, appellant states that the deadline for filing her brief is currently May 7, 2021, and requests an extension to May 24, 2021. However, our records reflect that a reporter’s record has been requested but has not yet been filed. Also on April 27, 2021, we issued an order directing the official court reporter for the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County to file the reporter’s record for this case no later than May 27, 2021. Because the appellate record is not yet complete, the deadline for filing appellant’s brief cannot yet be determined. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellant’s brief will be due no later than thirty days after the completion of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Accordingly, appellant’s motion to extend time to file her brief is dismissed as moot. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Amparo Guerra_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __May 4, 2021___

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: LaTanya Thompson v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., as the Successor in Interest to IndyMac Bank, FSB Appellate case number: 01-21-00147-CV Trial court case number: 1156055 Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County On April 27, 2021, appellant, LaTanya Thompson, filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. In her motion, appellant states that the deadline for filing her brief is currently May 7, 2021, and requests an extension to May 24, 2021. However, our records reflect that a reporter’s record has been requested but has not yet been filed. Also on April 27, 2021, we issued an order directing the official court reporter for the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County to file the reporter’s record for this case no later than May 27, 2021. Because the appellate record is not yet complete, the deadline for filing appellant’s brief cannot yet be determined. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellant’s brief will be due no later than thirty days after the completion of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Accordingly, appellant’s motion to extend time to file her brief is dismissed as moot. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Amparo Guerra_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __May 4, 2021___

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

LaTanya Thompson v. Yellowfin Loan Servicing Corp., as Successor in Interest to Indymac Bank, F.S.B., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latanya-thompson-v-yellowfin-loan-servicing-corp-as-successor-in-texapp-2021.