Latama, Inc. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 824, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1296
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” and “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of knives and forks similar in all material respects to those the subject of National Carloading Corp. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2529), except that the items marked “B” are with handles other than nickel silver or steel, the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Latama, Inc. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 824, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1296 (cusc 1966).
57 Cust. Ct. 824 (Latama, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Carloading Corp. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 178 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)