Lataillade v. Santa Barbara Gas Co.

58 Cal. 4
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1881·No. No. 7,422·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The Court:

The complaint filed in the Court of the Justice of the Peace was sufficient to uphold a judgment by the Justice, and sufficient in the absence of special demurrer to sustain the judgment of the Superior Court. (Carroll v. Carghill, 4 Cal. 121; O’Callahan v. Booth, 6 id. 63; Leining v. Gould, 13 id. 598; Stuart v. Landers, 16 id. 372; Watson v. Whitney, 23 id. 375.) As defendant entered by permission of plaintiff, he is estopped from denying her title. (Tewksbury v. Magraff, 33 Cal. 237; Bigelow on Estoppel, 350 and 381.) The judgment is for thirty-six dollars. Appellant argues with some elaboration (but we are not completely convinced) that this is about five dollars too much.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lataillade v. Santa Barbara Gas Co., 58 Cal. 4 (Cal. 1881).

58 Cal. 4 (Lataillade v. Santa Barbara Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christian v. Betak
N.D. California, 2025
(DP) Catlin v. Davis
E.D. California, 2019
Blackman v. Dalton's Auto & Furniture Loans, Ltd.
124 P.2d 123 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Moran v. Ebey
104 P. 522 (Montana Supreme Court, 1909)
Illinois Steel Co. v. Budzisz
119 N.W. 935 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)