Laszlo Habda v. Jack Wysocker, Esq

Third Circuit

Laszlo Habda v. Jack Wysocker, Esq

458 F.2d 537, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9818

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 1, 1972·No. 71-1428·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s civil action for damages against his former attorney alleges that the attorney in a criminal case in a state court neglected to challenge the legal sufficiency of an indictment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that there was no federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1343. On the authority of Thomas v. Howard, 455 F.2d 228 (3d Cir., filed Feb. 9, 1972), we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s civil action for damages against his former attorney alleges that the attorney in a criminal case in a state court neglected to challenge the legal sufficiency of an indictment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that there was no federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1343. On the authority of Thomas v. Howard, 455 F.2d 228 (3d Cir., filed Feb. 9, 1972), we affirm.

Laszlo Habda v. Jack Wysocker, Esq, 458 F.2d 537, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9818 (3d Cir. 1972).

Pincite

458 F.2d 537 (Laszlo Habda v. Jack Wysocker, Esq) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related