Lastracco v. Henegan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lastracco v. Henegan

253 A.D. 844, 2 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8874

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 28, 1938·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate the service of summons and complaint made as provided in sections 52 and 52-a of the "Vehicle and Traffic Law affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The question of statutory limitation is not involved on this appeal. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to vacate the service of summons and complaint made as provided in sections 52 and 52-a of the "Vehicle and Traffic Law affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The question of statutory limitation is not involved on this appeal. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Lastracco v. Henegan, 253 A.D. 844, 2 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

253 A.D. 844 (Lastracco v. Henegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.