Lastinger v. Waites

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lastinger v. Waites

316 S.E.2d 39, 169 Ga. App. 759, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1701

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 13, 1984·No. 67409·Published

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

The issue raised by this appeal is essentially identical to that in our recent decision in Hyde v. Klar, 168 Ga. App. 64, (308 SE2d 190), and is controlled thereby. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court in refusing to dismiss the estate of the deceased driver of the deceased plaintiffs vehicle, as impleaded third party defendant, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Shulman, P. J, concur. J. Harvey Davis, Glenn Whitley, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Judge.

The issue raised by this appeal is essentially identical to that in our recent decision in Hyde v. Klar, 168 Ga. App. 64, (308 SE2d 190), and is controlled thereby. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court in refusing to dismiss the estate of the deceased driver of the deceased plaintiffs vehicle, as impleaded third party defendant, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Shulman, P. J, concur. J. Harvey Davis, Glenn Whitley, for appellees.

Lastinger v. Waites, 316 S.E.2d 39, 169 Ga. App. 759, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1701 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

316 S.E.2d 39 (Lastinger v. Waites) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related