Laster v. Compton

Fourth Circuit

Laster v. Compton

94 F. App'x 993

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 22, 2004·No. No. 04-6100·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Laster, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Laster v. Compton, No. CA-03-763-7 (WD.Va. Nov. 18, 2003; Dec. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Laster, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Laster v. Compton, No. CA-03-763-7 (WD.Va. Nov. 18, 2003; Dec. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Laster v. Compton, 94 F. App'x 993 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

94 F. App'x 993 (Laster v. Compton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related