Laster v. Compton
This text of Laster v. Compton (Laster v. Compton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6100
CHRISTOPHER LASTER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
B. G. COMPTON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-03-763-7)
Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 22, 2004
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Laster, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Christopher Laster, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) and his subsequent motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Laster v. Compton, No. CA-03-763-7 (W.D. Va.
Nov. 18, 2003; Dec. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Laster v. Compton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laster-v-compton-ca4-2004.