Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

474 F. App'x 234

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2012·No. No. 12-1162·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment and dismissing her claims and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Indus., Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2012). We grant Lassiter’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment and dismissing her claims and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Indus., Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2012). We grant Lassiter’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 474 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 234 (Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.