Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, Board of Trustees

Eleventh Circuit

Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, Board of Trustees

19 F.3d 1370

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, Board of Trustees. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 F.3d 1482 →

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 14, 1994·No. No. 92-6295·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, Board of Trustees, 19 F.3d 1370 (11th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

19 F.3d 1370 (Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, Board of Trustees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.