Lassell v. Burton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Lassell v. Burton

16 Vt. 188

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJanuary 15, 1844

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Vt. 188 (Lassell v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lassell v. Burton, 16 Vt. 188 (Vt. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

In this case it being suggested, and appearing to the court, that the affirmance of the judgment might embarrass the plaintiff in pursuing a just claim, which he had against the defendant, in a different form of action, the court reversed the judgment proforma, under a rule that the costs should be taxed the same as if the judgment had been affirmed. Applications of this kind have not usually been listened to by this court, except for the reason above stated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this case it being suggested, and appearing to the court, that the affirmance of the judgment might embarrass the plaintiff in pursuing a just claim, which he had against the defendant, in a different form of action, the court reversed the judgment proforma, under a rule that the costs should be taxed the same as if the judgment had been affirmed. Applications of this kind have not usually been listened to by this court, except for the reason above stated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Vt. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lassell-v-burton-vt-1844.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack