Lasprogato v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lasprogato v. State

826 So. 2d 1027, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10787, 2001 WL 863554

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 1, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-2271

StatusPublished

This text of 826 So. 2d 1027 (Lasprogato v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lasprogato v. State, 826 So. 2d 1027, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10787, 2001 WL 863554 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error we reverse the lower court’s order denying appellant’s release into a closely supervised and monitored conditional release program.

On remand, the trial court will immediately schedule a hearing and determine whether there has been any material change in appellant’s circumstances. In the absence of such changes, the Court will order appellant placed in the Passageways conditional release plan.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error we reverse the lower court’s order denying appellant’s release into a closely supervised and monitored conditional release program.

On remand, the trial court will immediately schedule a hearing and determine whether there has been any material change in appellant’s circumstances. In the absence of such changes, the Court will order appellant placed in the Passageways conditional release plan.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

826 So. 2d 1027, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10787, 2001 WL 863554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasprogato-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.