Lasonthia Sandles, Individually as as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Christine Rollins v. Louise Clymer Laskoskie and George Delbert Laskoskie, Sr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 29, 2022
Docket14-22-00879-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lasonthia Sandles, Individually as as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Christine Rollins v. Louise Clymer Laskoskie and George Delbert Laskoskie, Sr. (Lasonthia Sandles, Individually as as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Christine Rollins v. Louise Clymer Laskoskie and George Delbert Laskoskie, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lasonthia Sandles, Individually as as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Christine Rollins v. Louise Clymer Laskoskie and George Delbert Laskoskie, Sr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order filed December 29, 2022

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-22-00879-CV ____________

LASONTHIA SANDLES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CHRISTINE ROLLINS, Appellant

V.

LOUISE CLYMER LASKOSKIE AND GEORGE DELBERT LASKOSKIE, SR., Appellees

On Appeal from the 344th District Court Chambers County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV0416

ORDER The notice of appeal in this case was filed November 28, 2022. The clerk responsible for preparing the record notified this court that appellant has not made payment for the record. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. On December 5, 2022, this court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellant filed a response with proof of payment for the record. No response was filed. Therefore, the court issues the following order.

Appellant is ordered to demonstrate to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order arrangements have been made to pay for the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If appellant fails to do so, the appeal is subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lasonthia Sandles, Individually as as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Christine Rollins v. Louise Clymer Laskoskie and George Delbert Laskoskie, Sr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasonthia-sandles-individually-as-as-the-personal-representative-of-the-texapp-2022.