Lasky v. Lasky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lasky v. Lasky

216 A.D.2d 366, 628 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6259

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 366 (Lasky v. Lasky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lasky v. Lasky, 216 A.D.2d 366, 628 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 1, 1986, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered March 14, 1994, as granted the plaintiff wife temporary maintenance pending determination of her application to modify the judgment of divorce to provide for permanent maintenance.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances presented here, the Supreme Court [367]*367properly granted the plaintiffs motion to the limited extent of awarding her temporary maintenance in the amount of $1,500 per month and setting the matter down for a hearing. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 1, 1986, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered March 14, 1994, as granted the plaintiff wife temporary maintenance pending determination of her application to modify the judgment of divorce to provide for permanent maintenance.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances presented here, the Supreme Court [367]*367properly granted the plaintiffs motion to the limited extent of awarding her temporary maintenance in the amount of $1,500 per month and setting the matter down for a hearing. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 366, 628 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasky-v-lasky-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack