Lasky v. Hastings

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lasky v. Hastings

373 So. 2d 81, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15487

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 24, 1979

DocketNo. 78-2027

StatusPublished

This text of 373 So. 2d 81 (Lasky v. Hastings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lasky v. Hastings, 373 So. 2d 81, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15487 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed on the authority of Young v. Bramlett, 369 So.2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), holding that the medical liability mediation procedures set forth in Section 768.-44, Florida Statutes (1977), are not applicable to alleged malpractice claims against dentists. We note that at the time the trial court entered its order in this cause it did not have the benefit of the Young opinion. The cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Reversed on the authority of Young v. Bramlett, 369 So.2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), holding that the medical liability mediation procedures set forth in Section 768.-44, Florida Statutes (1977), are not applicable to alleged malpractice claims against dentists. We note that at the time the trial court entered its order in this cause it did not have the benefit of the Young opinion. The cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

373 So. 2d 81, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasky-v-hastings-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack