Lasky v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lasky v. City of New York

235 A.D.2d 209, 652 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 34

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D.2d 209 (Lasky v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lasky v. City of New York, 235 A.D.2d 209, 652 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 34 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Gorski, J., and a jury), entered August 1, 1995, in favor of defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was not prejudiced by any error in charging Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1121 instead of section 1120, as the former adequately conveyed what plaintiff wanted the jury to infer from the latter, namely, negligence based on defendant’s failure to keep far enough to the right as plaintiff’s vehicle approached in the opposite direction. The court properly refused to charge that defendant’s negligence could be inferred merely from the fact that its truck skidded before colliding with plaintiff’s car (see, Noia v De Rosa, 78 AD2d 789, affd 54 NY2d 631). The court also properly instructed, in response to jury questions, that the right of way was immaterial in this case. We have considered plaintiff’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Gorski, J., and a jury), entered August 1, 1995, in favor of defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was not prejudiced by any error in charging Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1121 instead of section 1120, as the former adequately conveyed what plaintiff wanted the jury to infer from the latter, namely, negligence based on defendant’s failure to keep far enough to the right as plaintiff’s vehicle approached in the opposite direction. The court properly refused to charge that defendant’s negligence could be inferred merely from the fact that its truck skidded before colliding with plaintiff’s car (see, Noia v De Rosa, 78 AD2d 789, affd 54 NY2d 631). The court also properly instructed, in response to jury questions, that the right of way was immaterial in this case. We have considered plaintiff’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D.2d 209, 652 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasky-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack