Lasker v. Johnson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lasker v. Johnson

159 S.W.3d 409, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 21, 2005 WL 41402

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 2005·No. No. WD 63604·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to this court’s mandate in Lasker v. Johnson, 123 S.W.3d 283 (Mo.App. W.D.2003) (“Lasker I”). Appellant Clinton Johnson brings four points on appeal. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, prepared a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to this court’s mandate in Lasker v. Johnson, 123 S.W.3d 283 (Mo.App. W.D.2003) (“Lasker I”). Appellant Clinton Johnson brings four points on appeal. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, prepared a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Lasker v. Johnson, 159 S.W.3d 409, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 21, 2005 WL 41402 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

159 S.W.3d 409 (Lasker v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related