Lasker-Goldman Corp. v. Delma Engineering Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lasker-Goldman Corp. v. Delma Engineering Corp.

32 A.D.2d 513, 298 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4299

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 A.D.2d 513 (Lasker-Goldman Corp. v. Delma Engineering Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lasker-Goldman Corp. v. Delma Engineering Corp., 32 A.D.2d 513, 298 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4299 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered December 17, 1968, granting plaintiff partial summary judgment against defendant under the first cause of action unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and the motion for summary judgment denied. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant under this cause is based upon a straight indemnity clause whereby defendant agreed to hold plaintiff “ harmless from all liability, loss, cost or damage” arising out of defendant’s performance as plaintiff’s subcontractor on a portion of certain construction work. Third parties have made claims for damage arising out of a mishap on the job, but, as far as is disclosed by the record, at the time of institution of the action, matters had not gone further •than the filing of claims with plaintiff. This is not an action for declaration of the rights of the parties, but is, in effect, a claim over by plaintiff against defendant. Plaintiff is as yet entitled to nothing from defendant, and the cause is asserted prematurely. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered December 17, 1968, granting plaintiff partial summary judgment against defendant under the first cause of action unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and the motion for summary judgment denied. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant under this cause is based upon a straight indemnity clause whereby defendant agreed to hold plaintiff “ harmless from all liability, loss, cost or damage” arising out of defendant’s performance as plaintiff’s subcontractor on a portion of certain construction work. Third parties have made claims for damage arising out of a mishap on the job, but, as far as is disclosed by the record, at the time of institution of the action, matters had not gone further •than the filing of claims with plaintiff. This is not an action for declaration of the rights of the parties, but is, in effect, a claim over by plaintiff against defendant. Plaintiff is as yet entitled to nothing from defendant, and the cause is asserted prematurely. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 513, 298 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasker-goldman-corp-v-delma-engineering-corp-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack