Lasini v. Lasini

104 A.D.2d 1027, 480 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20464
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lasini v. Lasini. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 A.D.2d 907

Opinion

— In an action for a judgment declaring subdivision (1) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law unconstitutional, plaintiff Elsie Lasini appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.), dated April 24, 1984, which declared, inter alia, that the subdivision does not violate either the United States Constitution or the New York State Constitution.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[1028]*1028The common thread of plaintiff’s seven points is that the subject statute is unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous. We find no merit to plaintiff’s arguments (see Matter of Patricia A., 31 NY2d 83, 86-87). Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lasini v. Lasini, 104 A.D.2d 1027, 480 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

104 A.D.2d 1027 (Lasini v. Lasini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Patricia A.
286 N.E.2d 432 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)