Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lashinsky v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Putnam County

Lashinsky v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Putnam County

434 So. 2d 38, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20877
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 1983
DocketNo. 82-1595
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 434 So. 2d 38 (Lashinsky v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Putnam County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lashinsky v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Putnam County, 434 So. 2d 38, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

ORFINGER, Chief Judge.

We affirm the action of the trial court dismissing Lashinsky’s suit because we agree that section 701.04, Florida Statutes (1981), does not require a mortgagee to record a satisfaction of judgment following the sale of the mortgaged property by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to the final judgment of foreclosure. The recorded certificate of title and the certificate of sale in the judicial records show that the provisions of the final judgment have been complied with.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DIST. SCH. BD. OF DESOTO CTY. v. Safeco Ins. Co.
434 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 So. 2d 38, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lashinsky-v-first-federal-savings-loan-assn-of-putnam-county-fladistctapp-1983.