Lashinsky v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Putnam County

434 So. 2d 38, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20877
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 7, 1983·No. No. 82-1595·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORFINGER, Chief Judge.

We affirm the action of the trial court dismissing Lashinsky’s suit because we agree that section 701.04, Florida Statutes (1981), does not require a mortgagee to record a satisfaction of judgment following the sale of the mortgaged property by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to the final judgment of foreclosure. The recorded certificate of title and the certificate of sale in the judicial records show that the provisions of the final judgment have been complied with.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lashinsky v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Putnam County, 434 So. 2d 38, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

434 So. 2d 38 (Lashinsky v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Putnam County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DIST. SCH. BD. OF DESOTO CTY. v. Safeco Ins. Co.
434 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)