Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lasher v. State

Lasher v. State

64 So. 3d 166, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626, 2011 WL 2462834
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 22, 2011
DocketNo. 4D10-2714
StatusPublished

This text of 64 So. 3d 166 (Lasher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lasher v. State, 64 So. 3d 166, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626, 2011 WL 2462834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Flowers v. State, 54 So.3d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009), does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review); State v. Harris, 58 So.3d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding suppression was not warranted under good faith exception to exclusionary rule where vehicle search was conducted prior to issuance of Gant).

WARNER, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arizona v. Gant
556 U.S. 332 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Flowers v. State
54 So. 3d 1049 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Harris
58 So. 3d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 So. 3d 166, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626, 2011 WL 2462834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasher-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.