Lasher v. State

64 So. 3d 166, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626, 2011 WL 2462834
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 2011·No. No. 4D10-2714·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Flowers v. State, 54 So.3d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009), does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review); State v. Harris, 58 So.3d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding suppression was not warranted under good faith exception to exclusionary rule where vehicle search was conducted prior to issuance of Gant).

WARNER, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lasher v. State, 64 So. 3d 166, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626, 2011 WL 2462834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

64 So. 3d 166 (Lasher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arizona v. Gant
556 U.S. 332 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Flowers v. State
54 So. 3d 1049 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Harris
58 So. 3d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)