Lasher, John Edison
This text of Lasher, John Edison (Lasher, John Edison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-72,715-05
IN RE JOHN EDISON LASHER, Relator
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NOS. CM-01-192 and CM-01-193 IN THE 278th DISTRICT COURT
FROM LEON COUNTY
Per curiam.Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed applications for a writ of habeas corpus in the 278th District Court of Leon County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the applications have not yet been forwarded to this Court.
In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Leon County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas corpus applications, submitting a copy of any timely filed orders which designate issues to be investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that Relator has not filed applications for a writ of habeas corpus in Leon County. Should the response include any order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney's office was served with the habeas applications shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.
Filed: January 22, 2014
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lasher, John Edison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasher-john-edison-texcrimapp-2014.