LaShawn A. v. Barry

74 F.3d 303, 315 U.S. App. D.C. 400, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4404, 1996 WL 32955
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 30, 1996
DocketNo. 94-7044
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 74 F.3d 303 (LaShawn A. v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaShawn A. v. Barry, 74 F.3d 303, 315 U.S. App. D.C. 400, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4404, 1996 WL 32955 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of appellees’ Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the suggestion is granted. This case will be considered and decided by the court sitting in banc. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the judgment filed herein on October 31,1995 is hereby vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Planned Parenthood of AR, etc. v. Cindy Gillespie
867 F.3d 1034 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.
87 F.3d 1389 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)
Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. Giuliani
929 F. Supp. 662 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Messier v. Southbury Training School
916 F. Supp. 133 (D. Connecticut, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 303, 315 U.S. App. D.C. 400, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4404, 1996 WL 32955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lashawn-a-v-barry-cadc-1996.