LaShawn A. v. Barry
74 F.3d 303, 315 U.S. App. D.C. 400, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4404, 1996 WL 32955
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 30, 1996·No. No. 94-7044·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon consideration of appellees’ Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc, and the response thereto, it is
ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the suggestion is granted. This case will be considered and decided by the court sitting in banc. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the judgment filed herein on October 31,1995 is hereby vacated.
A future order will govern further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
LaShawn A. v. Barry, 74 F.3d 303, 315 U.S. App. D.C. 400, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4404, 1996 WL 32955 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
74 F.3d 303 (LaShawn A. v. Barry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Planned Parenthood of AR, etc. v. Cindy Gillespie
867 F.3d 1034 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.
87 F.3d 1389 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)
Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. Giuliani
929 F. Supp. 662 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.
77 F.3d 1063 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
Messier v. Southbury Training School
916 F. Supp. 133 (D. Connecticut, 1996)