Lash v. Freedom of Information Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Lash v. Freedom of Information Commission

980 A.2d 915, 293 Conn. 931, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 422

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 1, 2009·No. SC 18461·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 171 (AC 30137), is granted limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs had sustained their burden of proof that the documents submitted for in camera review were privileged?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named defendant improperly imposed a civil penalty on the plaintiffs?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 171 (AC 30137), is granted limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs had sustained their burden of proof that the documents submitted for in camera review were privileged?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named defendant improperly imposed a civil penalty on the plaintiffs?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Lash v. Freedom of Information Commission, 980 A.2d 915, 293 Conn. 931, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 422 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

980 A.2d 915 (Lash v. Freedom of Information Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related