Lash v. Freedom of Information Commission
980 A.2d 915, 293 Conn. 931, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 422
This text of 980 A.2d 915 (Lash v. Freedom of Information Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lash v. Freedom of Information Commission, 980 A.2d 915, 293 Conn. 931, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 422 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 171 (AC 30137), is granted limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs had sustained their burden of proof that the documents submitted for in camera review were privileged?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named defendant improperly imposed a civil penalty on the plaintiffs?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lash v. Freedom of Information Commission
14 A.3d 998 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
980 A.2d 915, 293 Conn. 931, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lash-v-freedom-of-information-commission-conn-2009.