Laseter v. State

183 S.E. 76, 52 Ga. App. 261, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 132
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1935
Docket25301
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 183 S.E. 76 (Laseter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laseter v. State, 183 S.E. 76, 52 Ga. App. 261, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 132 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

Tlie defendant was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor. His motion for a new trial, based solely on the general grounds, was overruled, and lie excepted. Held:

1. The evidence supported tlie verdict.

[262]*262Decided December 13, 1935. Williams & Freeman, for plaintiff in error. Frank B. Willingham, solicitor-general, contra.

2. Although the evidence of the witnesses for the State contained contradictions, there was no abuse of discretion in denying a new trial. Clemons v. State, 159 Ga. 425 (125 S. E. 800).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Guerry, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welch v. State
200 S.E. 806 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 S.E. 76, 52 Ga. App. 261, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laseter-v-state-gactapp-1935.