Lascelles v. Bidwell
102 F. 1004, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4648
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 19, 1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Motion denied on authority of Cruickshank v. Bidwell, 176 U. S. 73, 20 Sup. Ct. 280, 44 L. Ed. —. Complainant has an adequate, summary, and expeditious remedy at law under the customs administrative act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lascelles v. Bidwell, 102 F. 1004, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4648 (circtsdny 1900).
102 F. 1004 (Lascelles v. Bidwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Severance v. Bizallion
121 N.Y.S. 627 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Goetze v. United States
103 F. 72 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1900)