Lascelles v. Bidwell
102 F. 1004, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4648
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedMarch 19, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 102 F. 1004 (Lascelles v. Bidwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lascelles v. Bidwell, 102 F. 1004, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4648 (circtsdny 1900).
Opinion
Motion denied on authority of Cruickshank v. Bidwell, 176 U. S. 73, 20 Sup. Ct. 280, 44 L. Ed. —. Complainant has an adequate, summary, and expeditious remedy at law under the customs administrative act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Severance v. Bizallion
121 N.Y.S. 627 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Goetze v. United States
103 F. 72 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
102 F. 1004, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lascelles-v-bidwell-circtsdny-1900.