Lascaibar v. Lascaibar

773 So. 2d 1236, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16243, 2000 WL 1817056
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 2000·No. No. 3D99-2213·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

On Dismissal of Appeal

COPE, J.

In this post-dissolution-of-marriage proceeding, the question is whether the former wife can appeal after the former husband was found not guilty of indirect criminal contempt. The answer is no.

On remand from Lascaibar v. Lascaibar, 715 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), the trial court directed the former husband, Albert A. Lascaibar, to show cause why he should not be held in indirect criminal contempt. The former wife, Nivia Lascaibar, contended that the former husband was intentionally underemployed, thereby not earning enough to pay his child support arrearages.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lascaibar v. Lascaibar, 773 So. 2d 1236, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16243, 2000 WL 1817056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

773 So. 2d 1236 (Lascaibar v. Lascaibar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lascaibar v. Lascaibar
156 So. 3d 547 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Alex Diaz De La Portilla v. State of Florida
142 So. 3d 928 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Gordon v. State
960 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)