Lasaro Cortez Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 18, 2011
Docket03-10-00694-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lasaro Cortez Jr. v. State (Lasaro Cortez Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lasaro Cortez Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-10-00694-CR
Lasaro Cortez, Jr., Appellant


v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 63990, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N


Appellant Lasaro Cortez was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision after he pleaded guilty to possessing more than one gram of cocaine with intent to deliver and true to a previous felony conviction alleged for enhancement. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (c) (West 2010). The State later moved to adjudicate, alleging two violations of the conditions of supervision. Following a hearing, the trial court found the allegations to be true, adjudged appellant guilty, and imposed a fourteen-year prison sentence.

In his only issue on appeal, appellant contends that the evidence does not support the court's order that he pay $565 in attorney's fees. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.05(g) (West Supp. 2010); Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552, 556-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The State concedes that there is no evidence of a material change in appellant's financial status subsequent to his being found indigent.

The issue is sustained. The judgment of conviction is modified to delete the order that appellant pay $565 in attorney's fees. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.



___________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin

Modified and, as Modified, Affirmed

Filed: August 18, 2011

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayer v. State
309 S.W.3d 552 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lasaro Cortez Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasaro-cortez-jr-v-state-texapp-2011.