LaSalle National Bank v. Estate of Edmund H. Casse
This text of 36 A.D.3d 864 (LaSalle National Bank v. Estate of Edmund H. Casse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant estate of Edmund H. Casse appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fines, J.), entered February 1, 2006, as granted the plaintiffs motion, in effect, to confirm the referee’s report and is in favor of the plaintiff and against it directing a foreclosure sale.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly confirmed the referee’s report (see Adelman v Fremd, 234 AD2d 488 [1996]; Stein v American Mtge. Banking, 216 AD2d 458 [1995]; Shultis v Woodstock Land Dev. Assoc., 195 AD2d 677 [1993]) and directed a foreclosure sale. Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 A.D.3d 864, 827 N.Y.S.2d 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasalle-national-bank-v-estate-of-edmund-h-casse-nyappdiv-2007.