LaSalle National Bank v. Estate of Edmund H. Casse

36 A.D.3d 864, 827 N.Y.S.2d 663

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant estate of Edmund H. Casse appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fines, J.), entered February 1, 2006, as granted the plaintiffs motion, in effect, to confirm the referee’s report and is in favor of the plaintiff and against it directing a foreclosure sale.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly confirmed the referee’s report (see Adelman v Fremd, 234 AD2d 488 [1996]; Stein v American Mtge. Banking, 216 AD2d 458 [1995]; Shultis v Woodstock Land Dev. Assoc., 195 AD2d 677 [1993]) and directed a foreclosure sale. Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaSalle National Bank v. Estate of Edmund H. Casse, 36 A.D.3d 864, 827 N.Y.S.2d 663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

36 A.D.3d 864 (LaSalle National Bank v. Estate of Edmund H. Casse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shultis v. Woodstock Land Development Associates
195 A.D.2d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Stein v. American Mortgage Banking, Ltd.
216 A.D.2d 458 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Adelman v. Fremd
234 A.D.2d 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)