LaSalle Extension University v. Kronewitter
This text of 86 N.E.2d 707 (LaSalle Extension University v. Kronewitter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an attempt to appeal from a judgment of the St. Joseph Superior Court No. 1. The assignment of errors here is as follows:
“1. Court’s decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence;
“2. Court’s decision is contrary to law.”
Appellee has filed his motion to affirm the judgment on the grounds that no question has been presented by the above assignment of errors. The motion will have to be sustained. Burns’ 1946 Replacement, § 2-2401; Van Buskirk et al. v. Stover (1904), 162 Ind. *342 448, 70 N. E. 520; Zimmerman v. Gaumer et al. (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555, 53 N. E. 829.
Judgment affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 86 N. E. 2d 707.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 N.E.2d 707, 119 Ind. App. 341, 1949 Ind. App. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasalle-extension-university-v-kronewitter-indctapp-1949.