Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. US Currency $535,746.24

D. Nevada

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. US Currency $535,746.24

DecidedJanuary 19, 2022

Docket2:21-cv-00950

StatusUnknown

This text of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. US Currency $535,746.24 (Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. US Currency $535,746.24) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. US Currency $535,746.24, (D. Nev. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE 4 DEPARTMENT, 5 Plaintiff(s), 2:21-cv-00950-GMN-VCF ORDER 6 v. U.S. CURRENCY $535,746.24, 7 Defendant(s). 8 Before the Court is Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. U.S. Currency $535,746.24, 9 case number 2:21-cv-00950-GMN-VCF. 10 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), a filing fee is required to commence a civil action in federal court. 11 Here, Steven C. Gazlay has not complied with 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The filing fee has not been 12 paid. Gazlay must pay the full filing fee to commence an action in this matter or file an application to 13 proceed in forma pauperis. 14 Accordingly, 15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Steven C. Gazlay has until February 22, 2022, to pay the filing 16 fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may result in 17 dismissal of this case. 18

19 NOTICE 20 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and 21 recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk 22 of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal 23 may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified 24 time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections 25 within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the

5 right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court.

3 Martinez v. Ylist, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 4 (9th Cir. 1983). 5 Pursuant to Local Special Rule 2-2, Steven C. Gazlay must immediately file written notification 6 || with the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each 7 || opposing party of the party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this Rule may result in dismissal of the 8 action. See LSR 2-2. 9 0 DATED this 19th day of January 2022. Loew iene CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE 4 DEPARTMENT, 5 Plaintiff(s), 2:21-cv-00950-GMN-VCF ORDER 6 v. U.S. CURRENCY $535,746.24, 7 Defendant(s). 8 Before the Court is Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. U.S. Currency $535,746.24, 9 case number 2:21-cv-00950-GMN-VCF. 10 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), a filing fee is required to commence a civil action in federal court. 11 Here, Steven C. Gazlay has not complied with 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The filing fee has not been 12 paid. Gazlay must pay the full filing fee to commence an action in this matter or file an application to 13 proceed in forma pauperis. 14 Accordingly, 15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Steven C. Gazlay has until February 22, 2022, to pay the filing 16 fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may result in 17 dismissal of this case. 18

19 NOTICE 20 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and 21 recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk 22 of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal 23 may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified 24 time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections 25 within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the

5 right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court.

3 Martinez v. Ylist, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 4 (9th Cir. 1983). 5 Pursuant to Local Special Rule 2-2, Steven C. Gazlay must immediately file written notification 6 || with the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each 7 || opposing party of the party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this Rule may result in dismissal of the 8 action. See LSR 2-2. 9 0 DATED this 19th day of January 2022. Loew iene CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. US Currency $535,746.24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/las-vegas-metropolitan-police-department-v-us-currency-53574624-nvd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack