Las Vegas Insurance Adjusters v. Page
492 P.2d 616, 88 Nev. 16
Opinion
OPINION
We affirm the summary judgment entered below since there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. NRCP 56(c). The appellant’s claim for money from the respondent was compromised and settled by written agreement between them. The appellant’s effort to avoid the binding effect of that agreement is denied by the record which shows conclusively that the agreement was entered into with full knowledge of all relevant facts.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Las Vegas Insurance Adjusters v. Page, 492 P.2d 616, 88 Nev. 16 (Neb. 1972).
492 P.2d 616 (Las Vegas Insurance Adjusters v. Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Razaghi v. Razaghi Development Company, LLC
D. Nevada, 2023
Igert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
533 P.2d 1365 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1975)
Lucas v. Page
510 P.2d 868 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)
Sibson v. Farmers Insurance Group
498 P.2d 1331 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1972)