Las Palmas Food Company, Inc. v. Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co.

Ninth Circuit

Las Palmas Food Company, Inc. v. Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co.

245 F.2d 874, 114 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 473, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3300

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 29, 1957

Docket15306_1

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 245 F.2d 874 (Las Palmas Food Company, Inc. v. Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Las Palmas Food Company, Inc. v. Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co., 245 F.2d 874, 114 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 473, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3300 (9th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

245 F.2d 874

LAS PALMAS FOOD COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation; Pablo Baca Gavaldon and Ralph Worthington, Appellants,
v.
RAMIREZ & FERAUD CHILI CO., a Co-Partnership Composed of Frank Feraud and E. C. Feraud, Appellees.

No. 15306.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

July 29, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; William C. Mathes, Judge.

Mason & Howard, C. Loy Mason and Paul P. Selvin, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Harris, Kiech, Foster & Harris, Warren L. Kern and Walton Eugene Tinsley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before LEMMON, CHAMBERS, and BARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

All of the points relied upon for reversal on this appeal were ably considered and disposed of by the trial judge in his opinion reported at D.C., 146 F.Supp. 594. We adopt it as our own. For the reasons therein stated, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI