Larue v. Waid

239 F. App'x 849
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2007·No. No. 07-6907·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William A. LaRue seeks to appeal the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge entered May 21, 2007. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders LaRue seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larue v. Waid, 239 F. App'x 849 (4th Cir. 2007).

239 F. App'x 849 (Larue v. Waid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)