Larue v. Gaskins
5 Cal. 507
Opinion
Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.
The transfer of the cause from the Justice’s to the District Court, was illegal, and cannot defeat the plaintiff’s rights by operating a dis? continuance.
After the decision of this Court, the case stood on the docket .as if no transfer had ever been made, and it was his duty to proceed and try it. Being disqualified by the statute, he should have transferred it.
Thé Court below is directed to issue a peremptory mandamus.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Larue v. Gaskins, 5 Cal. 507 (Cal. 1855).
5 Cal. 507 (Larue v. Gaskins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. Justice's Court
89 P. 870 (California Court of Appeal, 1907)
People ex rel. Flagley v. Hubbard
22 Cal. 34 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Henderson v. Allen
23 Cal. 519 (California Supreme Court, 1863)