Larue, Joe Edward

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 25, 2015
DocketPD-1544-15
StatusPublished

This text of Larue, Joe Edward (Larue, Joe Edward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larue, Joe Edward, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PD-1544-15 PD-1544-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS November 25, 2015 Transmitted 11/25/2015 11:09:01 AM Accepted 11/25/2015 11:28:18 AM ABEL ACOSTA IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS CLERK

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

JOE EDWARD LARUE * Appellant * * vs. * No. PD * COA No. 09-14-00441-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, * Appellee *

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, the Appellant, by and through her undersigned Attorney of

Record, and respectfully moves the Court to extend the time for filing a petition for

discretionary review in this cause, and in support therefore would show the Court as

follows:

I.

Joe LaRue was convicted in this court of capital murder, and sentenced to life in the

Texas Department of Criminal Justice in April 2005. Following such conviction defendant

pursued a direct appeal which was denied, as well as an application for writ of habeas corpus

which was also denied. Defendant then filed a Motion for DNA testing pursuant to the provisions

of Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which was denied. Appellant appealed

his conviction to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Judicial District. That court affirmed

the trial court decision in an opinion delivered on October 28, 2015. II.

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is currently due on November 28,

V.

Appellant hereby requests an extension of time to file his Petition for Discretionary

Review until January 29, 2016, and as reasons therefore would show this cause as

Counsel does not have sufficient to time to properly prepare a petition for

discretionary review by the current due date, and for that reason seeks additional time to

do so. Counsel would show that he has had several matters to deal with in the last thirty

days. As a result, counsel has not had sufficient time to devote to the petition in this

case..

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully requests this

honorable court to extend the time for filing Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review

in this cause to January 29, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Walter M. Reaves, Jr. Walter M. Reaves, Jr. 100 N. 6 th Street, Suite 802 Waco, Texas 76701 (254) 296-0020 FAX (877) 726-4411 TBA#16644200 walterreaves@att.net CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing motion was delivered to

District Attorney for Jefferson County, on November 25, 2014.

/s/ Walter M. Reaves, Jr. Walter M. Reaves, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Larue, Joe Edward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larue-joe-edward-texapp-2015.