Larson v. State
This text of 700 So. 2d 388 (Larson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard Dewey LARSON a/k/a Duane Hatnenn, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Spiro T. Kypreos, Pensacola, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PADOVANO, Judge.
Richard Dewey Larson, the defendant, appeals his conviction of manslaughter with a weapon and his departure sentence of fifteen years in the Department of Corrections. We find no error in the conviction but we must remand the case for resentencing because the trial court did not make contemporaneous written findings in support of the departure sentence. Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990); State v. Colbert, 660 So.2d 701 (Fla.1995). On remand, the trial court must impose a guideline sentence. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). We reject the state's argument that this issue was not preserved for review. The sentence was imposed before July 1, 1996, the effective date of section 924.051, Florida Statutes, at a time when an unpreserved sentencing error could be raised on appeal if the error was apparent from the face of the record.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
MINER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
700 So. 2d 388, 1997 WL 423076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larson-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.