Larson v. May Department Stores Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Larson v. May Department Stores Company

603 A.2d 339, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 248, 1992 WL 47397

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMarch 13, 1992

DocketNo. 91-627-M.P.

StatusPublished

This text of 603 A.2d 339 (Larson v. May Department Stores Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larson v. May Department Stores Company, 603 A.2d 339, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 248, 1992 WL 47397 (R.I. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case came before the court for oral argument on March 4, 1992 on the petition for certiorari of the defendant to review an order entered by a justice of the Superior Court awarding a sanction in the amount of $400 for a violation of Rule 37 of the Rules of Civil Procedure of the Superior Court.

After considering the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that the awarding of a sanction sua sponte by the Superior Court Justice was unwarranted under the circumstances. The objection raised by counsel for the defendant to the disclosure of certain personnel records was neither frivolous nor without justification. The fact that the motion justice issued a protective order in respect to such records was a strong indication that defendants’ argument was not without merit.

Consequently the order awarding a sanction is quashed. The papers in the case may be remanded to the Superior Court with our decision endorsed thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case came before the court for oral argument on March 4, 1992 on the petition for certiorari of the defendant to review an order entered by a justice of the Superior Court awarding a sanction in the amount of $400 for a violation of Rule 37 of the Rules of Civil Procedure of the Superior Court.

After considering the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that the awarding of a sanction sua sponte by the Superior Court Justice was unwarranted under the circumstances. The objection raised by counsel for the defendant to the disclosure of certain personnel records was neither frivolous nor without justification. The fact that the motion justice issued a protective order in respect to such records was a strong indication that defendants’ argument was not without merit.

Consequently the order awarding a sanction is quashed. The papers in the case may be remanded to the Superior Court with our decision endorsed thereon.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

603 A.2d 339, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 248, 1992 WL 47397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larson-v-may-department-stores-company-ri-1992.