Larson v. Larson
82 Miss. 116
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
No doubt the chancellor below was as reluctant to decide in the way in which he did as we are to sustain him. But we must affirm the decree rendered by him on the authorities cited in his opinion and in the briefs of counsel. Service by publication on a nonresident defendant in suit for alimony is not enough. The law in regard to in rem proceedings has no application to the facts of this case. Insanity of a grantor in a conveyance may be shown by the defense in an action of ejectment.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Larson v. Larson, 82 Miss. 116 (Mich. 1903).
82 Miss. 116 (Larson v. Larson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. Thompson
527 So. 2d 617 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1988)
Campbell v. Campbell
357 So. 2d 129 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1978)
Johnson v. Johnson
191 So. 2d 840 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1966)
Darby v. Darby
277 S.W. 894 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1925)