Larson v. Kalcevic
62 P.2d 572, 99 Colo. 279, 1936 Colo. LEXIS 215
This text of 62 P.2d 572 (Larson v. Kalcevic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Larson v. Kalcevic, 62 P.2d 572, 99 Colo. 279, 1936 Colo. LEXIS 215 (Colo. 1936).
Opinion
not participating. Mr. Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Bouck and Mr. Justice. Young being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, and Mr. Chiee Justice. Campbell, Mr. Justice Butler and Mr. Justice Holland being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, the court being evenly divided, the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
62 P.2d 572, 99 Colo. 279, 1936 Colo. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larson-v-kalcevic-colo-1936.