Larson v. Brockmann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Larson v. Brockmann

106 N.W. 1133, 98 Minn. 526, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 624

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 27, 1906

DocketNos. 14,747-(75)

StatusPublished

This text of 106 N.W. 1133 (Larson v. Brockmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larson v. Brockmann, 106 N.W. 1133, 98 Minn. 526, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 624 (Mich. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question before the trial court was whether or not the promissory note-on which the action was brought had been materially changed before it was-delivered by the maker to the payee. The trial court found for respondent upon evidence that was conflicting, and although the documentary evidence introduced for the purpose of identifying the handwriting strongly indicates-that the interlineation was not made by appellant, yet the evidence to the effect that the note was changed after delivery is not so convincing as to call for a, reversal.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The question before the trial court was whether or not the promissory note-on which the action was brought had been materially changed before it was-delivered by the maker to the payee. The trial court found for respondent upon evidence that was conflicting, and although the documentary evidence introduced for the purpose of identifying the handwriting strongly indicates-that the interlineation was not made by appellant, yet the evidence to the effect that the note was changed after delivery is not so convincing as to call for a, reversal.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 N.W. 1133, 98 Minn. 526, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larson-v-brockmann-minn-1906.