Larson v. Adams

Fourth Circuit

Larson v. Adams

378 F. App'x 369

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 17, 2010·No. No. 09-2042·Published

Opinion

[370]*370Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Allen Larson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Larson v. St. Paul Dept. of Labor in Minnesota, No. 5:08-cv-00437-FL, 2008 WL 5338208 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 19, 2008). We deny Larson’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[370]*370Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Allen Larson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Larson v. St. Paul Dept. of Labor in Minnesota, No. 5:08-cv-00437-FL, 2008 WL 5338208 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 19, 2008). We deny Larson’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Larson v. Adams, 378 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

378 F. App'x 369 (Larson v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related