Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Larson-Jackson v. Neal

Larson-Jackson v. Neal

551 So. 2d 567, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2473, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5810, 1989 WL 120837
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 1989
DocketNo. 89-1208
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 551 So. 2d 567 (Larson-Jackson v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larson-Jackson v. Neal, 551 So. 2d 567, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2473, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5810, 1989 WL 120837 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This cause is per curiam affirmed. See § 48.193(l)(h), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1988). This amended version of the statute was in effect at the time of the trial judge’s ruling. Apparently, the parties did not advise the trial judge of this amendment, which renders his decision correct albeit for the wrong reason. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

AFFIRMED.

[568]*568LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., . concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oldt v. Sides
573 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 So. 2d 567, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2473, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5810, 1989 WL 120837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larson-jackson-v-neal-fladistctapp-1989.