Larson Group, Inc. v. Thomson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Larson Group, Inc. v. Thomson

416 S.W.3d 377, 2013 WL 6823710, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1536

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 24, 2013·No. No. WD 76360·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Larson Group, Inc. d/b/a Peterbilt of Springfield appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision that concluded Tanya Thomson was eligible for unemployment benefits. The Larson Group contends that the Commission’s decision was in error because the evidence established that Thomson was discharged for misconduct connected to her work. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Larson Group, Inc. d/b/a Peterbilt of Springfield appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision that concluded Tanya Thomson was eligible for unemployment benefits. The Larson Group contends that the Commission’s decision was in error because the evidence established that Thomson was discharged for misconduct connected to her work. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Larson Group, Inc. v. Thomson, 416 S.W.3d 377, 2013 WL 6823710, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1536 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

416 S.W.3d 377 (Larson Group, Inc. v. Thomson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.